Home Templates Calculators Videos Academy Software Merchandise About Contact Login
Analyse Phase · DMAIC Template

Kano Analysis Template

A root cause technique that drills from a problem to its underlying cause by asking Why five times.

SimplicityHub 5 Whys Template — editable Excel template

What is a Kano Analysis Template?

A Kano Analysis Template provides a structured framework for categorising customer requirements into Must-Be, Performance and Delighter (Attractive) attributes based on customer survey responses.

When to use a Kano Analysis Template

Use it in the Define or Measure phase after gathering Voice of the Customer data. Kano analysis is particularly powerful before prioritising improvement scope or designing a new product or service.

Who should use a Kano Analysis Template

  • Black Belts and Green Belts — prioritising customer requirements for improvement focus in the Define or Measure phase
  • Product managers and owners — deciding which features to invest in based on their actual impact on customer satisfaction
  • Customer experience teams — understanding which service attributes create loyalty versus which merely prevent dissatisfaction
  • Innovation and design teams — identifying the Attractive features that will differentiate their product or service in the market

How to use a Kano Analysis — step by step

  1. 1
    Write the problem statement at the top

    Start with a clear, factual problem statement. 'Machine stopped' or 'Customer received wrong item' — specific, observable, factual. Vague problems produce vague root causes.

  2. 2
    Ask 'Why did this happen?' — Why 1

    Write down the first-level cause. This is usually a symptom or a direct cause — not yet the root. Examples: 'Machine overheated', 'Wrong item was picked'.

  3. 3
    Ask 'Why did that happen?' — Why 2

    Challenge the previous answer. Keep the team focused on causes, not blame. If the answer is 'human error', push further — why did the human make the error?

  4. 4
    Continue to Why 3, 4 and 5

    Keep going until you reach a cause that is systemic — a missing process, a failed control, a gap in training or a design flaw. The number five is a guide, not a rule.

  5. 5
    Check the logic by reading upward

    Read the chain back to front: 'Because of X, Y happened, which caused Z.' If the logic holds, you have a valid chain. If it breaks, revisit the step where it breaks.

  6. 6
    Identify the actionable root cause

    The root cause is the deepest level where a corrective action can prevent recurrence. Document it clearly — this feeds your Improve phase solution design.

  7. 7
    Validate before acting

    Do not jump to solution immediately. Check whether data or observation confirms the root cause is real and significant before committing resource to fixing it.

Worked example — Online Banking Feature Prioritisation

A digital team ran Kano analysis on 12 proposed app features with 65 customers — finding that instant notifications were Must-Be (absence caused strong dissatisfaction), financial dashboards were Performance (more detail = more satisfaction) and voice commands were Attractive (unexpected delight).

Worked example — Online Banking Feature Prioritisation

Common mistakes — and how to avoid them

⚠️

Using Kano to justify features already selected. Kano analysis should inform decisions, not validate them. If the survey is run after the feature roadmap is set, it has no influence.

⚠️

Too small a sample. A sample of fewer than 20 customers produces unreliable classifications. Aim for 30+ for initial insights and 80+ for statistical confidence.

⚠️

Ignoring category shifts over time. Attractive features become Performance features and then Must-Be features as customer expectations rise. Re-run Kano analysis periodically.

⚠️

Not acting on the Must-Be findings. Must-Be failures cause strong dissatisfaction. If your analysis reveals Must-Be attributes that are not being consistently delivered, fix them before investing in Attractive features.

Tips for getting better results

💡

Include the dysfunctional question for every feature. The dysfunctional question (how do you feel if this feature is absent?) is essential for correct classification. Don't shortcut the survey by omitting it.

💡

Use Kano to deprioritise as well as prioritise. Indifferent features (customers don't care either way) are investment traps. The analysis gives you permission to stop working on them.

💡

Cross-segment the results. Different customer segments may classify the same feature differently. Segmenting by customer type often reveals important strategic insights.

Toolkit Packs £9

Advanced Toolkit Packs — available now

Structured, ready-to-use template packs designed for real improvement work. Pick the pack that matches your project and get started straight away.

Process Improvement Starter Pack

A starter pack for identifying improvement opportunities, measuring baselines and planning action.

Preview 1 Preview 2 Preview 3
▶ Preview inside

Root Cause Analysis Toolkit

A practical RCA toolkit for defining problems, finding causes, validating evidence and creating action.

Preview 1 Preview 2 Preview 3
▶ Preview inside

A3 Template Pack

A clean A3 problem-solving pack for concise, visual improvement thinking and follow-through.

Preview 1 Preview 2 Preview 3
▶ Preview inside
× Preview