Home Templates Calculators Videos Academy Software Merchandise About Contact Login
Analyse Phase · DMAIC Template

Pugh Matrix Template

A root cause technique that drills from a problem to its underlying cause by asking Why five times.

SimplicityHub 5 Whys Template — editable Excel template

What is a Pugh Matrix Template?

A Pugh Matrix (Concept Selection Matrix) is a structured comparison tool that evaluates multiple design or solution concepts against a reference concept using a set of criteria. Scores are +, – or S (same) for each criterion.

When to use a Pugh Matrix Template

Use it in the Improve phase after generating solution concepts, when you need to select between fundamentally different approaches rather than just rank similar solutions.

Who should use a Pugh Matrix Template

  • Black Belts and Green Belts — selecting between fundamentally different solution concepts in the Improve phase
  • Design and engineering teams — evaluating competing design options against customer and technical requirements
  • Product owners — making structured feature and scope decisions based on objective comparative scoring
  • Improvement teams — choosing between significantly different process redesign approaches before piloting

How to use a Pugh Matrix — step by step

  1. 1
    Write the problem statement at the top

    Start with a clear, factual problem statement. 'Machine stopped' or 'Customer received wrong item' — specific, observable, factual. Vague problems produce vague root causes.

  2. 2
    Ask 'Why did this happen?' — Why 1

    Write down the first-level cause. This is usually a symptom or a direct cause — not yet the root. Examples: 'Machine overheated', 'Wrong item was picked'.

  3. 3
    Ask 'Why did that happen?' — Why 2

    Challenge the previous answer. Keep the team focused on causes, not blame. If the answer is 'human error', push further — why did the human make the error?

  4. 4
    Continue to Why 3, 4 and 5

    Keep going until you reach a cause that is systemic — a missing process, a failed control, a gap in training or a design flaw. The number five is a guide, not a rule.

  5. 5
    Check the logic by reading upward

    Read the chain back to front: 'Because of X, Y happened, which caused Z.' If the logic holds, you have a valid chain. If it breaks, revisit the step where it breaks.

  6. 6
    Identify the actionable root cause

    The root cause is the deepest level where a corrective action can prevent recurrence. Document it clearly — this feeds your Improve phase solution design.

  7. 7
    Validate before acting

    Do not jump to solution immediately. Check whether data or observation confirms the root cause is real and significant before committing resource to fixing it.

Worked example — Selecting a New Booking System

A project team used a Pugh Matrix to compare 4 booking system concepts against the current state across 8 criteria — revealing one concept as clearly dominant on 6 of 8 criteria and prompting a hybrid design that combined its strengths.

Worked example — Selecting a New Booking System

Common mistakes — and how to avoid them

⚠️

Choosing a weak datum. If the datum (reference concept) is obviously inferior, all alternatives will score + across the board and the matrix provides little discrimination. Choose a realistic reference.

⚠️

Scoring without evidence. Each + or – score should be justified. Unsupported scores reflect team bias, not objective evaluation.

⚠️

Not iterating after the first round. The most valuable Pugh Matrix insight is often hybrid concept design — combining the best features of top-scoring concepts. Don't stop at the first pass.

⚠️

Letting one person dominate scoring. Group scoring produces better outcomes than individual scoring. Discuss and agree every cell where views differ.

Tips for getting better results

💡

Change the datum and re-score. If one concept is clearly the best candidate, make it the new datum and re-score to confirm it is better than the others on all important criteria.

💡

Focus attention on minus scores. A concept with many minuses on critical criteria is a warning sign even if its total score is acceptable. Investigate the minuses carefully.

💡

Document the rationale. Record why each + or – was assigned. This makes the decision defensible and creates a useful record for future reference.

Toolkit Packs £9

Advanced Toolkit Packs — available now

Structured, ready-to-use template packs designed for real improvement work. Pick the pack that matches your project and get started straight away.

Process Improvement Starter Pack

A starter pack for identifying improvement opportunities, measuring baselines and planning action.

Preview 1 Preview 2 Preview 3
▶ Preview inside

Root Cause Analysis Toolkit

A practical RCA toolkit for defining problems, finding causes, validating evidence and creating action.

Preview 1 Preview 2 Preview 3
▶ Preview inside

A3 Template Pack

A clean A3 problem-solving pack for concise, visual improvement thinking and follow-through.

Preview 1 Preview 2 Preview 3
▶ Preview inside
× Preview